Former President
of Argentina’s Central Bank Addresses Alumni
Is Argentina Bouncing Back?
During a recent Continuous Education
session, Javier González Fraga, former President of the
Argentinean Central Bank said, "The best thing that could
happen to Argentina is that nobody lend it money for the next
10 years."
González Fraga gave an overview of developments
in the Argentinean economy since President Kirchner took office
and explained how the country’s economic and financial situation
was expected to develop.
The former Central Bank President underlined the
fact that the Argentine GDP fell by more than 20 percent in real
terms during 2002. During the three preceding years, it had fallen,
on average, between 2 percent and 2.5 percent anually.
“In that one year (2002), inflation rose to
41 percent, while it had shown negative rates during previous
years. In the meantime, the unemployment rate rose to around 20
percent according to official figures, and poverty took a hold
on the country.”
A Vigorous Recovery
González Fraga explained that “during
2003 and the first months of 2004, we have rather surprisingly
seen what seems to be a vigorous recovery in the Argentine economy.
Real growth in 2003 was around 8 percent, the second highest growth
figure in the world after China. And it has not fallen below 6
percent since the beginning of this year.”
At the same time, inflation dropped to 4 percent
in 2003, the unemployment rate was reduced by 4 percentage points
and the current balance of payments showed a notable surplus,
at 7.1 percent. “Despite the uncertainty that lies ahead
during the coming months, the hard data is impressive,”
he said.
Management Expert
Offers Insights
Management Styles of Japan’s Top Companies
According to Japanese business expert Dr. Kimio
Kase, all business leaders fall into one of two management styles.
Knowing the strengths and weaknesses of their style will help
executives successfully ride out critical situations.
Dr. Kase, a professor at Globis Management School in Japan, offered
insights into the mentality of Japanese business leaders at a
Continuous Education Session that brought together over 50 IESE
alumni in Barcelona in May.
Nissan, Shinsei Bank, Yamato Transport, Sony and
Shin-Etsu Chemical are five of Japan’s most outstanding
companies and household names. Dr. Kase has studied the companies’
management practices in-depth and has identified the factors that
made the companies successful, especially during the turbulent
’90s after the bubble economy of the ’80s burst.
Dr. Kase divides Japanese management styles into two mental schemes:
the “Proto-Image of the Firm” (PIF) and the “Profit-Arithmetic”
(PA). With PIF, decisions are highly influenced by the abstract
image that the leader holds of the company; the PA approach is
more pragmatic and is motivated by profit and the bottom line.
IESE professor Pedro Nueno, who chaired the event, said that while
the American management model remains the gold standard around
the world, there is still much to learn from Japan. “Just
as Japanese managers were not aware of their own blind spots that
preceded their fall, those who think they are invincible must
begin to digest these lessons,” he said. Nueno hinted that
American and Chinese business leaders are potentially the most
susceptible to a Japan-style fall from grace.
Kase underscored this point when he noted that while many faithfully
follow the U.S. for setting management trends, he felt that the
European and Japanese management models were more universally
applicable and sustainable.
Deans, Business
Leaders Present Views
The State of European Corporate Governance
Business Leaders Discuss European Corporate Governance
Trends
"The board is the very last place where companies
globalize," observed Gabriel Hawawini at a recent conference
on "Trends and Best Practices In Corporate Governance,"
held at IESE's Madrid campus.
Hawawini, Dean of INSEAD business school, was one
of several experts to speak at the event, which was part of the
IESE Continuous Education Program. IESE's Dean Jordi Canals also
made a presentation on corporate governance.
Other speakers included Enrique Aldama, Vice-Chairman
of CEOE and Chair of the “Aldama Commission”; and
Alfredo Sáenz, CEO of Santander Group.
In his talk titled "New Trends in Corporate
Governance in Europe," Profesor Hawawini said that board
members cannot afford to be out of sync with the business culture
and strategy of today's organizations. One of the main problems
of the companies involved in recent scandals in both Europe and
the United States, he said, was that many boards failed to align
themselves with global strategies, and thus did not fully adapt
to changing situations. Many boards, he added, still have
not restructured or adapted to the new global business culture,
and as a result they have continued to lose competitive ground.
Proof of this, he noted, is that in Europe less than 15% of board
members are internationals, and in the United States the number
is even lower –where less than 2% of members are internationals.
Jordi Canals demonstrated in his presentation why
the trends in corporate governance are not merely the latest fad,
but rather represent a fundamental structural change in the field
of business administration. He compared the three European
traditions (the British, the German and the Spanish) in terms
of the legal reforms and decision-making processes of boards of
directors. Canals concluded his presentation with some remarks
on the great challenges that boards face in the upcoming years
with respect to their real contribution to business.
Enrique Aldama commented in his talk "How are
European Companies Improving Corporate Governance?" on the
current situation of Spanish firms. He observed that practically
all of them have complied with his commission's recommendations
in terms of transparency, security and responsiveness.
As a practical example, Alfredo Sáenz explained how Santander
Group is implementing its changes. He highlighted the importance
of creating a system adapted to the reality and characteristics
of Europe, since from his point of view, the recent legislation
in the United States is the result of an overreaction to the numerous
business scandals there. He added that this has imposed complicated
and costly bureaucracy on the organization of boards, and has
caused some firms to seriously question whether or not they should
remain registered in the stock market there.
Sáenz concluded his presentation by pointing
out that the most important thing is the quality of the board
members themselves, and thus the advice they can give. "In
the end, what really counts is people."
|